It was in the modern era that Western civilization took flight, however. A rich heritage The mixed ancestry of Western civilization gave it a rich heritage to draw on.
Worse, we are not even conscious of the fact. We insist on seeing the world through our Western prism.
No other tradition or history or culture can compare. Ours is superior to all and others, in deviating from ours, are diminished as a consequence. This speaks not of our wisdom but our ignorance, an expression not of our cosmopolitanism but our insularity and provincialism.
It is a consequence of being in the ascendant for at least two centuries, if not rather longer. Eurocentrism — or perhaps we should say western-centrism — has become our universal yardstick against which, in varying degrees, all others fail.
This mindset threatens to become our greatest handicap as we enter an era in which Europe will be progressively marginalised, the United States will experience irreversible decline, the emergent nations will become major actors and China will replace the United States as the dominant power.
In other words, those countries and cultures that we now look down upon will increasingly become the arbiters of the future. How will we ever make sense of them if we refuse to understand them in anything other than our own Western terms?
How will they view us if we continue to look down upon their culture and polities as inferior to our own? Which brings us to China. We choose to see China overwhelmingly in a context calibrated according to Western values: No doubt you could add a few more to that list. I am not arguing that such issues do not matter — they do — but our insistence on judging China in our own terms diverts us from a far more important task: If we fail to do that then, quite simply, we will never understand it.
That is why mainstream Western commentary on China over the last three or more decades has singularly failed to get China right, from predicting the imminent downfall of the regime after Tiananmen Square and the likely break-up of the country, to the constant insistence ever since that the economic growth could not possibly last and that the regime would be unable to sustain itself.
Virtually no-one predicted what has happened; phenomenal economic growth for over thirty years and a regime that has been hugely successful and which now enjoys greater legitimacy and prestige than at any time since the reform period began in Our western-centric value-judgements about China must no longer be allowed to act as a substitute for understanding the country in its own terms.
This is no easy task. China is profoundly different from the West in the most basic of ways. Perhaps the most basic difference is that it is not a nation-state in the European sense of the term.
Indeed, it has only described itself as such since around Anyone who knows anything about China is aware that it is a lot older than that. China, as we know it today, dates back to BC, in some respects much earlier.
That date marked the end of the Warring States period, the victory of the Qin, and the birth of the Qin Empire whose borders embraced a considerable slice of what is today the eastern half of China and by far its most populous part. For over two millennia, the Chinese thought of themselves as a civilization rather than a nation.
The most fundamental defining features of China today, and which give the Chinese their sense of identity, emanate not from the last century when China has called itself a nation-state but from the previous two millennia when it can be best described as a civilization-state: The implications are profound: Although China describes itself today as a nation-state, it remains essentially a civilization-state in terms of history, culture, identity and ways of thinking.
China, as a civilization-state, has two main characteristics. Firstly, there is its exceptional longevity, dating back to even before the break-up of the Roman Empire.
Secondly, the sheer scale of China — both geographic and demographic — means that it embraces a huge diversity. Contrary to the Western belief that China is highly centralised, in fact in many respects the opposite is the case: It is simply too large.Impact of Christianity on western civilization.
Jump to navigation Jump to search. This article has many issues. Please help fix them or discuss these issues on the talk page. The English used in this article or section may not be easy for everybody to understand.
You can help Wikipedia by. But the myths themselves — the main effect of which was to confirm my suspicion that whoever devised the idea of the multiverse is off his rocker — are not the book’s important feature. Western civilization traces its roots back to Europe and the alphabetnyc.com is linked to the Roman Empire and with Medieval Western Christendom which emerged from the Middle Ages to experience such transformative episodes as the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, scientific revolution, and the development of liberal democracy.
alphabetnyc.com ® Categories History, Politics & Society History War and Military History World War 1 What was the Impact after World War 1 in Western Civilization?
SAVE CANCEL already exists. Western culture, sometimes equated with Western civilization, Occidental culture, the Western world, Western society, and European civilization, is a term used very broadly to refer to a heritage of social norms, ethical values, traditional customs, belief systems, political systems and specific artifacts and technologies that have some origin.
How Islamic Learning Transformed Western Civilization: Review of 'The House of Wisdom' "The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization is a page treasure trove of information for the uninitiated that packs a powerful punch of science, history.