Pro The End justifies the Means. Whenever we approach a scenario, we should only think about the ends. The means are irrelevant except as to their impact on the Ends. As long as the Ends are justified, than the means are justified as well.
The Hebrew word used here for "men" is "Ghever," and it is commonly associated with warfare. Exodus does not specify how or if the men were armed unless perhaps Exodus Yet it does not seem to occur to the fleeing Israelites to fight back against the pursuing Egyptians.
They behave like a small band of trapped refugees. Other Bible sources, such as the census that was taken later, indicate a much smaller number of Hebrew refugees.
The sun moved backwards for Joshua and for Hezekiah. It was a sin to make up this hoax. It is a smaller sin to propagate it without verifying the facts, but certain evangelists do just that.
The idea behind the story is to make up some scientific-sounding story to explain a Biblical event. This pattern appears later in creationism literature, in supplying details of the catastrophes claimed to be part of the Flood events.
My objection to the Biblical story is that I don't see how this could have happened without leaving some geological trace, and without the Book of Jashar mentioned in Joshua Certain sections of the Bible imply that the Joshuan conquest was a sudden sweeping through the land of Canaan.
Archeology suggests that the conquest was gradual, over a period of a hundred years or so, and so do certain other Biblical texts.
If those are the only problems, then the accuracy of the Bible after Genesis 11 compares favorably with other ancient literature the Iliad. The examples cited above are trivial and are not important to Salvation.
The point is, if those three are all the inaccuracies we can complain about, then the Bible after Genesis 11 is rock-solid as a historical source. The first 11 chapters of Genesis do contain some historically verifiable facts.
We know of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. We know the mountains of Ararat in Turkey. The Tower of Babel is similar to Babylonian ziggurats.
The contrast is with the rest of the Bible. You can carbon-date to the time of Christ a fishing boat excavated from the bottom of the Sea of Galilee, and match certain of its design features to the Gospel account of Jesus calming a storm.
It is only against this high level of verified history that the first part of Genesis seems a little strange. I am not bold or arrogant enough to conclude that "the Biblical statement thatHebrew fighting men crossed the Red Sea is wrong.
I will only say that it sounds suspicious against other Biblical accounts, archaeology, and other historical sources.
An Egyptian account of the Exodus story that confirms the Biblical number could be found tomorrow. Miracles Everything else in the Bible that's out of the ordinary is a bona fide miracle.
A miracle is God's temporary suspension of natural laws in response to human need. The turning of water into wine by Jesus is reported as a miracle, so let's believe it that way. We can also believe that God could stop the sun for Joshua and Hezekiah without causing enormous tidal waves.
It's okay to believe that the "extra water" of the Flood came from the hand of God, and then returned to His hand when the Flood was over. The crossing of the Red Seathe stopping of the Jordan River, the destruction of Jericho - these are all miracles enacted by God Almighty.Do the ends justify the means essay to write in free business plan where can i buy wallpaper from in pietermaritzburg hopkins thesis guidelines.
Social characteristics of educational decentralization implemented in means justify the do ends the essay classess to and achievement tests. Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli (/ ˌ m æ k i ə ˈ v ɛ l i /, Italian: [nikkoˈlɔ mmakjaˈvɛlli]; 3 May – 21 June ) was an Italian diplomat, politician, historian, philosopher, humanist, writer, playwright and poet of the Renaissance period.
He has often been called the father of modern political science. For many years he was a senior official in the Florentine Republic. Utilitarian theories, on the other hand, must answer the charge that ends do not justify the means.
The problem arises in these theories because they tend to separate the achieved ends from the action by which these ends were produced. The question whether the end justifies the means depends on the type of goal or end a person wants to achieve and the means they use.
If both the means and the ends are equally noble and good, there is no question because the ends are justified by the means.
This is the stand I have chosen to take. This essay will discuss the human benefits received and the negative impacts on both humans and animals. By analysing these three aspects, the evidence provided will evaluate whether the end does justify the means of this method.
The development of various drugs have been assisted by animal testing which has saved numerous lives and become medical discoveries. ESSAY QUESTIONS ON HAMLET Note: Some of the questions are examination-type questions; others are questions for learners to answer as a means to understanding the play.